|
What
is the Second Circle?
|
Time
and again our eyes were brought together
by
the book we read; our faces flushed and paled
Dante,
Inferno
|
|
The Second Circle
Review
BREAK
IT DOWN
by
Lydia Davis
reviewed
by C.J. McCarthy
RECENTLY, LYDIA DAVIS has deservedly gained acclaim
for her collection of short fictions Almost No
Memory (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1997).
In the early Eighties she was known mainly for her
outstanding translations of some of the most important
authors of modern French literature, Blanchot and
Leiris amongst them. The mark of their resilient
fictions is as evident in Break It Down,
her breakthrough collection, as that of such American
masters of shorter fiction as Abish, Barthelme and
Cheever.
The blurb touts these 34
pieces as her 'debut' collection, but in fact it
includes pieces culled from her three earlier books,
The Thirteenth Woman (1976), Sketches
for a Life of Wassily (1981), and Story and
Other Stories (1983). Davis displays narrative
and linguistic virtuosity in the range of approaches
she takes to her material-from prose poem-like vignettes
to interior monologues to fragmentary portraits.
Even without its title, the collection's binding
concern is clear—a
determination to disintegrate the cosy dichotomies
a neurotic age insists on appealing to: fear and
threat, action and thought, desire and satisfaction,
memory and aspiration.
|
BREAK
IT DOWN
by
Lydia
Davis
You
may order this title by clicking on the link corresponding
to your delivery region below: orders are fulfilled
by our partners at Amazon.
AMERICAS,
AFRICA,
AUSTRALASIA
& ASIA
EUROPE |
If any other general comment can
span the remarkable stylistic and intellectual scope of
these pieces, it is that the author is less interested in
the drama of action than that of analysis. The reader rarely
accompanies a protagonist or narrator through a sequence
of events, but rather is audience to a series of subsequent
analyses. In the title story, for instance, reviewing a
brief, intense relationship, a man attempts to tally the
sex with the money he spent while with the woman. But (as
for so many of Davis' characters) the experience exceeds—indeed
resists—precise evaluation;
the more he strives to identify a finite number of events
or acts, the more the relationship emerges as part of a
flux which preceded and survived this encounter. Indeed,
the narrator's persistent efforts at evaluation are testimony
to this:
So it's not really $100 a shot because it goes
on all day, from the start when you wake up and feel her
body next to you ... And it's still all a surprise and
it never stops, even after it's over, it never stops being
a surprise. It's more like you have a good sixteen or
eighteen hours a day of this going on, even when you're
not with her it's going on ... you can't go off and look
at some old street or some old painting without still
feeling it in your body ...
Such hindsight is, of course, complemented by developments
subsequent to the remembered events. In "The Bone" a woman
remembers seeing a young doctor remove a fish-bone from
her husband's throat:
More than ten years have passed since then,
and my husband and I have gone our separate ways, but
every now and then, when we are together, we remember
that young doctor. 'A great Jewish doctor,' says my husband,
who is also Jewish.
The sense conveyed in this, the piece's final line, is that
the bond between husband and wife has proved less durable
than that between husband and doctor. Such finely-nuanced
touches abound in these pieces-touches one is liable to
miss if disarmed by their cool, playful, at times almost
casual air, the effect of eschewing excessive sympathy for
ruthless, systematic observation of her characters.
The natural landscape of Break
It Down is a predatory one; so prevalent are images
of decay that any hope for endurance (be it of a house,
a memory or a relationship) seems futile. Equally, it is
a world where little, accumulated certainties must fill
the place of general truths: Maybe the
truth does not matter but I want to know it only so that
I can come to some conclusions about such questions as:
whether he is angry at me or not; if he is how angry;
whether he still loves her or not; if he does, then how
much; whether he loves me or not; how much; how capable
he is of deceiving me in the act and after the act in
the telling.
In one piece after another, this distinction between the
recollection and the recollected is ruthlessly broken down.
Ignoring the actual text of a letter, its handwriting, envelope
and addressing are scrutinized in an attempt to reconstruct
the physical act of its composition and the intentions of
its author. Prospective conversations are rehearsed in advance,
past conversations dissected, in the process only rendering
their meaning all the more ambiguous. In rehearsing or resuscitating
the speakers, Davis' characters are simultaneously expending
and expanding their desire, attempting to maintain some
sense of relationship with others:
I sit down and write in my notebook that when
he calls me either he will then come to me, or he will
not and I will be angry, and so I will have either him
or my own anger, and this might be all right, since anger
is always a great comfort, as I found with my husband.
Among the forms Davis uses are
those of the fable and the parable, playing ironically on
the sense of unity and nostalgia these forms evoke. Simultaneously,
she uses the cadence and symmetry of those forms to convey
the sense of inevitability her characters experience, as
in "In A House Besieged" (given here complete): In
a house besieged lived a man and a woman. From where they
cowered in the kitchen the man and woman heard small explosions.
'The wind,' said the woman. 'Hunters,' said the man. 'The
rain,' said the woman. 'The army,' said the man. The woman
wanted to go home, but she was already home, there in
the middle of the country in a house besieged.
Where her material will be served by it, Davis resorts to
a whole gamut of styles and approaches. Irony, anachronism
and hyperbole, for instance, are used only ever as a way
of illuminating interpretation: Of course
any daughter, crying in the hour of her birth, is only
a failure, and is greeted with a heavy heart by her father,
since the man wanted two sons. He tries again: again it
is only a daughter. This is worse, for it is a second
daughter; then it is a third, and even a fourth. He is
miserable among females. He lives, in despair, with his
failures.
Typically here, Davis' achievement is in maintaining sympathy
for the father and daughter's mutually dependent sense of
failure while criticizing its origin. In short, there is
no use of the many narrative strategies or devices merely
to impress: where it might have proved merely witty to offer
paranoias as literal representations, for instance, Davis
uses this as a way of depicting a narrator determined to
see purpose behind general phenomena:
People of all ages are hired by the city to
act as lunatics so that the rest of us will feel sane.
Some of the lunatics are beggars too, so that we can feel
sane and rich at the same time.
Time after time, Davis explores such self-obsession without
succumbing to its solipsisms.
In the community of isolated minds
which makes up the cast of Break It Down, the possibility
of communication is only ever conveyed obliquely. Perhaps
the best example of this is the deceptively simple "French
Lesson I", which describes a rural French scene as a method
of introducing the 'student' to a number of simple French
nouns. In the course of the lesson, the narrator/teacher
proposes that languages do not share any definite community
of meaning, and refuses to accept that ferme and
farm are equivalents, for instance insisting they
derive their significance from the landscapes they are respectively
home to. As the story progresses, however, a process of
tacit association is used to reveal what began as idyllic
as yet another potential scene of anxiety and violence.
That is to say, the story can only 'work' on the basis that
the readers will sense this—that
is, that there is the possibility of a shared community
of meaning. In this collective portrait of the complexity
of human relationships, that between author and reader is
no less complex or compelling than any other.
C.J. McCarthy
Reviews
by C.J. McCarthy at The Second Circle:
Break it Down by Lydia Davis
Land of Green Plums by Herta Muller
The Age of Wire and String by Ben Marcus
Brief Reviews including Arnon Grunberg and Harry Mulisch
|
|
|
| |
|